Friday, 10 February 2017

Blowing the lip on the whole Hampstead Satanic Ritual Child Abuse Scandal.

Blowing the lid on the whole Hampstead satanic ritual child abuse scandal which was 100% covered up by the demonically-controlled mass media gutter press and the 100% satanically-controlled corrupt police, judiciary and the maniacally psychopathic Mad-Houses of Parliament and not forgetting Her Infernal Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Straight from the mother's mouth, we finally hear the full story behind the Hampstead kids satanic ritual abuse scandal.

Sweeping away any doubt that the kids are lying, Ella Draper's testament covers every pertinent event from first discovering the horrific abuse her kids suffered, to the heart-breaking moment the kids were taken away and their stories retracted.

For the first time ever, we hear the true story of what happened to the Hampstead kids and what really goes on behind the closed doors of the Hampstead community.

Lets jump straight in and hear from Ella herself, about how she first found herself in England.

"I came to London having married Mr. Draper in Russia and being pregnant with his son James. James first lived with me and since our divorce with his father."

So this is obviously where Ella gets her surname from...

What about Ricky Dearman? Lets jump back into Ella's narrative and find out...

"During my relationship with Mr Dearman, there had been five Police call outs and three reports between 2006 and 2010. On the worst occasion, he tried to crack my skull with his knee on my head when I was on the bathroom floor. He only stopped, for my older son James called the Police who came quickly. I felt, unfortunately, too terrorized and intimidated to press charges at the time."

Wow; Ricky Dearman appears to be a nasty piece of work. A hundred miles away from the innocent victim as portrayed by Victoria Derbyshire and the BBC.

Ella continues, "Mr. Dearman's frequent outbursts of rage and violence, consistent emotional pressure, abuse, humiliating attitude became unbearable. In one instance he threw a chopping board with knife towards me but missed. In another, he broke my glasses and threw all my clothes into a ditch in front of the house."

The Past of an Abuser as Father

"Mr. Dearman has never provided financially for the children, except £10 per child per month taken off his benefits during the last 3-4 years. He hardly ever spent any quality time with them at home. He would never read a book or play games with them. The only game he seemed to play was the "tickling game". I wasn't happy about this since it always led to some kind of abuse. For example, Mr. Dearman wouldn't stop tickling children even though they would scream for him to stop. Besides, he would normally start this odd game late in the evening when the children would already have taken a bath and be ready for bed. This would send them hyper and those situations would almost always end up in arguments since I wanted to protect the children. Furthermore, all of a sudden James started to dislike Mr. Dearman. Mr. Dearman responded with humiliating remarks and attempted to discipline James in strange ways. For example, he would lock him up, while I was at work or shopping, and he would give him a bucket to pee and poo. This would almost always also result in arguments."

The word 'sadistic' springs to mind.

"He also harassed me sexually, pressuring me to have anal sex with him. He then bought a gigantic artificial penis suggesting for me to use. On many occasions he attempted to get me to watch online pornography. I objected to his perverted sexual attempts, threw the sex toy in the bin and asked Mr. Dearman to pick his stuff he had in my house and not to come there again."

This happened in 2007. Its sad when any loving relationship comes to an end, but by the sounds of this one, I expect it was a tremendous relief to get rid of the pervert. But of-course; as with everything in life, it isn't always smooth sailing. As Ella continues, "However, he came to school to "surprise" the children and often stalked us, showing up from nowhere: in the park, or on the way to school and in shops. I warned him on many occasions to stop doing this, but he requested to see the children. Many times he came and knocked on my door without prior notice and several times he broke in through the garden door. On one of such occasions he was violent and humiliated my mother by screaming and hitting her. He ran away before I dialed the police."

The Past of Family Court Proceedings over Access to the Children

"Since the stalking continued, I applied for an Emergency Court Order, and a Non-Molestation Order was granted for a month initially and then extended for 8 months while proceedings for contact were going on. I sent Alisa to Russia to stay with my parents. Unfortunately her passport ran out and she ended up staying slightly longer than anticipated.

A week after my application, his solicitors applied for a 'Prohibited Steps Order' since he claimed that I was trying to take the children out of the country. This was dismissed and there is currently no such Order in place. Mr. Dearman also made an application for contact. This was eventually granted in spite of my concerns for the children's safety. He started to see them regularly: every Saturday from 10am to 6pm.

However, contacts were not going well at all. Mr. Dearman was consistently returning the children late. He rejected my advice regarding their diet and was returning packed lunches of home prepared food.

Alisa and Gabriel were frequently getting sick during contact. Many times they vomited while in his care or after they came back home. Sometimes they developed headaches and stomach aches. I blamed this on food that Mr. Dearman was feeding them with.

My solicitors and I have sent numerous reminders, requesting not to feed the children with processed, sugary snacks. On one occasion Alisa developed high fever and hardly moved. I contacted the emergency doctor's line and almost took her to the emergency room.

Not only were the children returning sick or becoming sick shortly after, each time they were coming back in a terrible emotional and psychological state. A lot of Mondays or first part of the school week were missed as a result and affected the children’s education."

The Past of Sexual Abuse in the Dearman Family

"During holidays in August 2014, the children were confronted by my then partner when they sexually not only touched each other, but also a dog. Our comments triggered major revelations regarding the abuse they had suffered not only from their father but also many other adults.

In fact, it all seems to have started with Mr. Dearman’s brother, sister, his brother’s wife, his mother and 3 associates. The children abused, besides his own, were his nephews and nieces as well as two toddlers who one of the associates was looking after.

According to the children, this seems to have gone on before the children went to school and carried on while they were in school. However, it appears that not only the abuse increased, but also the number of abusers and the schedule of ritual acts."

The Failure by Christchurch School to Protect Children

"According to the children’s accounts, their father has been coming regularly to the school to abuse them and other children there, together with his associates.

Since I have a Residence Order for the children, I had asked the school administration in writing NOT to let their father take them out of school without my consent. However, he did so to sell them like prostitutes for £55 and £50 at a time.

Their father filmed the abuse of his and other children to create child pornography and snuff movies, selling them online."

CSA and Infant Sacrifice in Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA).

"Mr. Dearman is the leader of a satanic cult that practices not only child sexual abuse but also infant sacrifice. Cult members include school staff, parents, solicitors, Social Services, CAFCASS staff, doctors, the school nurse and professionals from many walks of life.

Their meetings are held regularly in schools, church rooms, the East Finchley swimming pool as well as in private places. Details are available in a separate file of abusers with names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses and schedules. Notably, these include references to 16 London Police stations."

Reporting Crimes to Barnet Police

"On Thursday 04 September we reported the abuse to Police Officer Mr. Jean Clement of Wood Green Police, but in private, at his home, as he is a member of the family. He filmed and recorded the children's accounts. Subsequently, his laptop was confiscated as part of the investigation.

On Friday 05 September the matter was apparently transferred to the Child Abuse unit of Barnet Police Station and later that evening, my children were first interviewed. Even though I thought that these interviews would be confidential, Mr. Dearman was alerted and complained to my solicitor.

One of the allegations made by the children was that they and other children in the school were given heavy drugs (cocaine, heroine) and were injected with sedative medication. To this day, I have not seen the test results of their hair samples. In spite of numerous enquiries, the police kept quiet about them during the entire time of investigation.

In total, the children were interviewed for about 3 hours each by Police. The medical examination initiated by the Police, confirmed the allegations of sexual and physical abuse, indicating serious injuries on the inside of the rectum area – due to the insertion of plastic objects. Both children were subjected to violence, which resulted in impaired hearing and arrested the development of Gabriel. Mr. Dearman used to hit and shout into the children’s ears and once hit Gabriel so hard that his ear was bleeding."

The Children in Care - in the Best Interests of the Children?

"On 11 September 2014 the children were taken into protective custody. Two weeks later I was told that they retracted all allegations against their abusers.

In spite of very detailed statements that the children provided, despite their medical examinations supporting the allegations, Barnet Police decided to close the case. The justification was that the children retracted their statements and that the investigation disproved their allegations.

The reasons given for retracting the statements were that the children took details of their "made up" story from the film "The Mask Of Zorro"

However, it is hard to believe that the intricate details of teachers' private parts, descriptions of their birth marks, moles, piercing on parents' and the school staff's private parts, descriptions of dancing with skulls, injections of children with sedative medication, infant trafficking and international child pornography movie business came from the innocent adventure PG film.

Plastic willies are used to sexually abuse children in Christchurch primary school in Hampstead, London. I was told that the children are saying that they saw this image on their friend Sarah's iPad.

I believe that the children retracted their allegations either because they got scared or someone threatened them. According to the children, not only school staff and parents are involved in the cult but also social workers, CAFCASS, lawyers as well as Police.

I believe that very serious misconduct by Police has occurred. The Police Officers in charge of the investigation: DI Matt Fernandez, DI Steve Martin and DI Cannon were reluctant to carry on the investigation or even questioning Mr. Dearman and other alleged abusers."

There Ella's testament ends, but her story is far from over. By all accounts Ella is no longer with her boyfriend Abraham Christie, and Ricky Dearman has been spotted in Brighton with his son Gabriel, who's had his hair dyed black.

While gossips are implying Ella was actively involved in Dearman's Satanic cult, others are claiming this is a MI6 sponsored character assassination designed to discredit her story.

What is known for sure is that a police laptop which had the children's testimonies of satanic ritual child abuse on it was never shown as evidence to the court. So, obviously the whole thing was a massive cover-up as the UK Goverment does not want the world to know that Britain is the most depraved filthiest place on earth, especially London.

With the Pizzagate scandal said to explode in the United States, the Hampstead Satanic scandal is building up to do the same in the United Kingdom.

With so many prominent and respected people named, its not surprising that the cover-up has been so complete and comprehensive. The Queen and Country had to pull out all the tricks of the trade to bury this one.

The Hampstead satanic ritual child abuse scandal just goes to prove how massive the evil is which resides at the heart of the British Establishment. Its one of those things in which people would rather look the other way, rather than face the enormity of the problem.

Our nation's leading charities acknowledge children have been victims of satanic abuse, but ask the average man or woman in the street and they'll scratch their head in bewilderment.

Jimmy Savile was said to be indulging in satanic ritual abuse since the early 1970's, and we all know who Savile's best friends were. As this here-in lies the white elephant in the room.

The reason the Hampstead satanic ritual child abuse scandal has been covered up with such resounding success, (that even the Truth Movement doesn't believe the kids,) is that our British Royalty are involved with child-abuse and (with the full resources of the State at their disposal,) have pulled out all the stops to bury this scandal with stunning affect.

Thank you to the Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike for information on this matter, of whom I've cut and pasted certain sentences and paragraphs.

Monday, 6 February 2017

A message from Vrillion, a representative from the Ashtar Galactic Command.

We've been warned by the Ashtar Galactic Command in 1977 to beware of the evil in our midst.

As Vrillion informed the world on 26 November 1977, when he interrupted BBC television, and gave a message to the people of Earth, which included the line below:

Ashtar Galactic Command

"The New Age can be a time of great peace and evolution for your race, but only if your rulers are made aware of the evil forces that can overshadow their judgments."

"This is the voice of Vrillion, a representative of the Ashtar Galactic Command, speaking to you.

For many years you have seen us as lights in the skies. We speak to you now in peace and wisdom as we have done to your brothers and sisters all over this, your planet.

We come to warn you of the destiny of your race and your world so that you may communicate to your fellow beings the course you must take to avoid the disaster which threatens your world, and the beings on our worlds around you.

This is in order that you may share in the great awakening, as the planet passes into the New Age of Aquarius. The New Age can be a time of great peace and evolution for your race, but only if your rulers are made aware of the evil forces that can overshadow their judgements.

Be still now and listen, for your chance may not come again.

All your weapons of evil must be removed. The time for conflict is now past and the race of which you are part may proceed to the higher stages of its evolution if you can show yourselves worthy to do this. You have but a short time to learn to live together in peace and goodwill.

Small groups all over the planet are learning this and exist to pass on the light of the dawning New Age to you all. You are free to accept or reject their teachings, but only those who learn to live in peace will pass to the higher realms of spiritual evolution.

Hear now the voice of Vrillion, a representative of the Ashtar Galactic Command, speaking to you. Be aware also that there are many false prophets and guides operating in your world. They will suck your energy from you – the energy you call money and will put it to evil ends and give you worthless dross in return.

Your Inner Divine Self will protect you from this. You must learn to be sensitive to the voice within that can tell you what is truth and what is confusion, chaos and untruth. Learn to listen to the voice of truth which is within you and will lead yourselves onto the path of evolution.

This is our message to our dear friends. We have watched you growing for many years as you too have watched our lights in your skies. You know now that we are here, and that there are more beings on and around your Earth than your scientists admit.

We are deeply concerned about you and your path towards the light and will do all we can to help you. Have no fear, seek only to know yourselves, and live in harmony with the ways of your planet Earth. We of the Ashtar Galactic Command thank you for your attention. We are now leaving the plane of your existence. May you be blessed by the Supreme Love and Truth of the Cosmos."

If you still don't believe we are not alone in our Solar system after watching the video below; then you really are Zombie Brain-dead.

Thursday, 2 February 2017

Does Katy Bourne pass The Full Code Test?

For the attention of Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions

The Full Code Test has two stages: (i) the evidential stage; followed by (ii) the public interest stage.

Q1. Is there sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction?

The nature of the criminal investigation against Katy Bourne is she made a false statement during an election to influence it's outcome.

The alleged 'false statement' was published on a Facebook sponsored up-date, of which the appropriate screen shots were recorded and accepted by the IPCC as credible evidence.

Further evidence will be my testament as an ex Royal Military policeman; of whom my reputation and character is without reproach.

Q2. Is there a realistic prospect of conviction?

Yes there is. Based on the screen shots of Katy Bourne's alleged 'false statements', combined with my testament as an ex Royal Military Policeman, there is a realistic prospect of conviction because the evidence speaks for itself.

Q3. Are there any reason to doubt the credibility of the evidence?

No; the evidence is self explanatory and is based on actual screen shots and my testament, as an ex Royal Military Policeman and independent Parliamentary candidate in the Brighton Kemptown 2015 General election.

Katy Bourne has acknowledged she was solely responsible for making the Facebook comments, which has landed her with a criminal investigation being instigated against her.

Q4. Is it in the public interest?

Yes; (and in the words of Gerry McCann) that's an emphatic yes.

Katy Bourne is being paid £85,000 a year, while her office costs the public £1.1M a year. She is responsible for managing a £250M budget of public funds and her most recent Police Tax rise of 5% affects everyone in Sussex.

Q5. How serious is the offence committed?

This is about trust in the police and trust in the people tasked with holding the police to account.

  • Katy Bourne is accused of failing to hold Sussex Police to account and as a consequence the 1996 murder cover-up of Katrina Taylor has been allowed to continue.
  • The collusion between Sussex police and known Crime Lord Mark Slade has been allowed to continue. (According to Joe Neilson – See the Neilson Files)
  • The elderly abuse of Joe Neilson, (the main witness in Katrina Taylor's murder) continues, leaving him to fend for himself, abandoned by Social Services, in hiding and too scared to return to his home, in fear of being murdered by the same crime gang responsible for Katrina Taylor's murder in 1996.
Joe Neilson after attack

  • The cover-up of historical child-abuse involving John Walson, and the possibility of children's bodies being buried in a Bognor Regis garden, ignored by Sussex Police.
  • The cover-up of fraud, theft of government money, and murder at the Bohemian Police Station in Hastings on February 12, 2009.

The offence committed is serious because the failure to hold Sussex police to account has proved to destroy lives and perpetuate organized crime, while Police Tax keeps going up and up.

Q6. What is the suspect's culpability?

Because Katy Bourne was solely responsible for writing and publishing the alleged 'false statements,' she is solely responsible for the fault and blame.

Q7. What is the harm to the victim?

Katy Bourne has already shut down the blog, citing harassment as her grounds to do so. I dispute this and further accuse Katy Bourne of abusing my Human Rights of Expression and Speech.

In light of the seriousness of police corruption and the events on 15 January 2015 (in which disabled OAP Joe Neilson, was attacked at our election office in Peacehaven; only for Sussex Police to arrest us and let our attackers go free;) the prospect of harm to the victim is clear, present and extremely dangerous.

Q8. Was the offence premeditated and/or planned?

Katy Bourne made the comments the day before the 5th May 2016 PCC elections. Any comment she would have made would of been made to influence the outcome of the election. Anything she wrote would clearly have been premeditated and planned to influence the readers to re-elect her.

Q9. Was the offence committed against a victims who was at the time a person serving the public?

Welcomed in the Oath of Office which Katy Bourne pledged to adhere, was a condition that she would welcome public scrutiny into her role.

As the self appointed Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, I was providing a public service on a voluntary basis, holding Katy Bourne to account.

A compliant Sussex press were clearly not asking the pertinent questions of why ex Chief Constable Martin Richards retired early.

At one point Brighton based hack and presenter of Latest TV's The Vote Show, Frank Le Duc, made a comment to Katy Bourne (while on The Vote show), that there was a trend of police officers retiring early to escape misconduct charges. Katy Bourne agreed with this observation, but no further questions were asked as to the circumstances why Martin Richards retired 9 months early, having had 24 complaints made against him, with all 24 complaints found to be 'unsubstantiated' by Mark Streater; a 30 year Sussex Police officer and close friend of Martin Richards.

Q10. Whether the offending, was or is likely to be continued, repeated or escalated?

The criminal investigation centres around Katy Bourne making a false statement to influence the outcome of an election.

Katy Bourne has since been accused of making a further false statement by Geoffrey Madden, who alleges the 80% of residents who Katy Bourne says agreed with her recommendation of a £5.00 increase in Police tax, to be false and based on flawed data. He challenges the result by saying he was unable to record his opinion with the office of SPCC and that from the public reaction to the prospect of a Police Tax rise gauged from comments left on newspaper articles, the true percentage of people against the tax increase is more in the region of 99% against, rather than the figure Katy Bourne quoted of 80% in favour.

Katy Bourne has demonstrated she will continue to make false statements to affect polls and election outcomes, if left in office.

Q11. What is the impact on the community?

The lack of trust in one's police force is the greatest of concern for any community. By failing to hold the police to account and accused of making false statements with the intent of influencing an election, the impact to the community is vast and comprehensive.

Police forces can only effectively police a community, by having the trust and consent of the community they serve. Abusing the trust of the community is a grave and serious offence and must be investigated with the full force of the Law.

In my experience as an ex Royal Military Policeman, I believe Katy Bourne passes The Full Code Test, and recommend she is investigated for committing a criminal offence under section 106 of the Representation of the People's Act 1983.

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Katy Bourne: My Part in her Downfall by Matt Taylor – Part One

Following the news that the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) have referred Katy Bourne, the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner (SPCC) to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for committing a criminal offence under section 106 of the Representation of People Act 1983; means her contention that 80% of the Sussex electorate agreed to her most recent 5% rise in police tax, is deemed null and void and must be stopped immediately.

Katy Bourne is under investigation for the criminal offence of making a false statement during an election to influence it's outcome. While the CPS conduct their investigation, Katy Bourne must be suspended from duties with immediate effect.

(What makes you think she hasn't made a false statement with reference to the poll's result, to influence it's outcome?)

"I challenge the poll figures."

A gentleman called Geoffrey Madden has publicly complained that he was unable to make his wishes known to the Office of Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, hence his opposition to the tax rise was not counted. (how many others attempted to voice their opposition to the tax increase but were unable to?)

Geoffrey asks fellow Sussex voters to register their count, if they attempted to leave their opinion on the Sussex PCC website, but wasn't able to.

“I challenge the poll figures,” says Geoffrey Madden

Katy Bourne is quoted to have said, "If the public do not want it then I will not bring it in."

The 80% figure of consent which Katy Bourne quoted to the Sussex Police Crime Panel is not reflected in the public comments left on a variety of news articles, published with reference to the tax increase. The nature of the negative responses imply 99% of Sussex residents are against the police tax increase.

Again Katy Bourne has been accused of electoral fraud, and considering she is now being investigated for electoral fraud by the CPS; doesn't it imply that her decision to raise the police tax is also based on equally fraudulent information?

Sussex Police and Untrustworthy Polls

Sussex Police Inflated

Whilst I find absolutely no pleasure whatsoever in highlighting this very serious and dangerous matter, it is of course naturally only correct that the mainstream media release the details around the topic and subject of the very reason of why the IPCC have handed the file over to the CPS for their consideration, where quite likely the matter could end up being placed before a “Criminal Crown Court” in the not to distant future, as the matter has been deemed a potential criminal offence.

Katy Bourne's office are refusing to answer any questions, saying "it would be inappropriate to comment at this time."

A keen Tweeter, Katy Bourne has been Twitter silent since the end of January. Only she knows what she'll say in her next monthly newsletter.
In my experience as an ex Royal Military Policeman, I believe Katy Bourne passes the Full Code Test, and recommend she is investigated for committing a criminal offence under section 106 of the Representation of the People’s Act 1983.
Katy Bourne’s office are refusing to answer any questions, saying it would be “inappropriate to comment any further.”
A keen Tweeter, Katy Bourne has been ‘Twitter silent’ since the end of January. Only she knows what she’ll say in her next monthly newsletter. But then again, she may have resigned by then…

Friday, 27 January 2017


I often feel as if the Zombie Apocalypse is now and that the world around me is occupied by brain dead zombies and that I'm one of only a handful of people who survived the brain-washing from our tell-a-lie-vision, responsible for turning so many people into brain-dead victims of government propaganda.

I do my best to look like the rest of them who wander aimlessly through life, subservient to the lies and deceptions which our government's endlessly pumps out on a daily basis. I daren't reveal my true nature in fear of the hordes of zombie brain-dead pointing me out to the Thought Police (TP), who would arrive within minutes in their police wagons, to drive me away to an undisclosed location for re-education.

Like millions of others, I'm forced to endure eight hours a day sat at a desk within a corporate organisation, to keep a roof over my head and food on the table; while captive, I'm forced to listen to the daily diatribe and tripe which these brain-dead zombies discuss with delight.

Repeating verbatim what Gary Lineker said on Match of the Day, regaling the awe inspiring achievements of ex American President Barack Obama, and how they still can't believe the ultimate heroine of the world, Hilary Clinton didn't make it to the White House, whilst that horrible, wicked, foul man called Trump, made it there instead.

I often feel like killing myself. Its either that or becoming a brain-dead zombie myself and with my hand on heart, I'd rather meet my Maker than for that to happen.

I scream silently in my head, "Beam me up Scotty," having to listen to my corporate superiors telling the office how much they've learnt from Youtube about the world around them. My ears prick up because I've learnt a lot about the world from Youtube but my heart rapidly sinks when I hear exactly what the zombie brain-dead have been watching:

If I told my zombie brain-dead work colleagues what I watch on Youtube, all Hell would break loose and the TP would be called within minutes:

A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon. (Well worth a Watch!)

Actually it nearly happened the other day. I didn't get much sleep the night before and within minutes of sitting at my desk in the morning, my disguise slipped.

The Queen Bee of the office, (whose name is being kept private for legal reasons), was telling us all about how terribly horrible and dreadful President Trump is. "I hate him; I genuinely despise the man and everything he stands for," she said with evident pride in her assessment.

Centered around the clip of Melania Trump's smile slipping into a frown, after Trump turning his back on her during his Inauguration, Queen Bee and her minions, Polly Whatis and Frilly Nilly, cackled like witches around their cauldron, as they agreed what hell it must be for her to be married to such an evil man.

I hadn't seen the clip, which by all accounts had gone viral across Social Media, and choose to keep my opinion to myself that being married to a billionaire couldn't be allbad, and that there could have been lots of reasons why her smile dropped as soon as his back was turned.

After all the talk of his assassination (of which Queen Bee was soooo looking forward to) I imagined Melanie, wasn't too pleased to be standing directly behind him!

Since then a video has been posted which paints a very different story of why her smile disappeared. It would seem she had been chastising young Barron for fidgeting and was rather annoyed with her son, more than anything to do with her husband.

I was brought into the conversation when Frilly Nilly shouted out that I'm a Trump supporter! To which I politely but firmly explained I'm not, but that I'm equally not a supporter of any politician, especially Barrack Obama and Hilary Clinton.

I've been hearing the same old shit for months; and having kept my mouth shut through all her hate talk and wishes for Trump to be assassinated, I forgot the potential danger of speaking out of turn and asked what President Obama had ever done for the world.

"Obama Care" she readily shot back, though how ObamaCare helped anyone outside of America is anyone's guess.

Daring to go to the edge, I made the observation, "I've heard an interesting fact the other day; apparently Obama is the only American President in history to have been at war everyday of his Presidency."

Queen Bee wasn't impressed and replied as if he still deserved his Nobel Peace Prize with the curt reply, "It wasn't Obama's fault he's been at war; he inherited wars from Bush."

Fuck me, the intelligent reasoning capacity of the brain-dead zombies really is non-existent and never ceases to amaze me.

Clearly tired and not thinking straight, I lambasted Obama for choosing to increase the use of drones, to demonstrate the ruthlessness of his approach to conflict resolution.

"Well what would you have done then, if you were President?" Queen Bee angrily retorted.

'What the fuck I would have done if I was President' I screamed silently in my head, 'What the fuck would I have done?'

I would have arrested every fucking politician in the Senate and Congress; I would have arrested the head of the CIA and FBI, I would have invaded the UK and disposed the Queen of England and I would have invaded Israel, while I was at it.

What a stupid fucking question to ask. Of-course I didn't dare give the response which was screaming to be heard, so I answered lamely, "I would have looked at the alternative options rather than bombing the fuck out of a country from thousands of meters up in the sky."

"Well using a drone is better than sending troops in," she said defending Obama to the hilt.

"Well I beg to differ."

"Oh do you," in evident disgust that I could possible disagree with her.

It was obvious that our conversation was getting us nowhere.

I would of loved to bring up much more on Obama but I knew if I did my cover would be blow and the TP would be called quicker than I could say, 'Barack Obama is a satanic worshipping liar who deserves to be thrown in jail for the crimes he's committed against humanity.”
  • I would have brought up the subject of Obama faking the capture and death of Osama Bin Laden to deflect attention away from his fake birth certificate.
  • I would have brought up his servitude to the banking cartels, who he allowed into his White House and let get away with the biggest banking fraud in world history.
  • I would have brought up his daily kill list, in which he assassinated hundreds of people, without trial.
  • I would have brought up the whistleblower secret serviceman Paul Horner, who published a tell-all book called 'The Black House' in which he revealed Obama was a gay muslim; not with-standing the persistent rumours that his wife Michelle, is a man called Michael.
  • And I would have dearly loved to bring up the video in which Larry Sinclair, revealed he gave Obama a blow-job and shared a crack cocaine pipe with him.

Donald John Trump

"But I just hate the man, I despise him, he revolts me, disgusts me, sickens me," she continued with evil intent in her eyes, ready to slash out at me if I dare to say anything else contrary to her beliefs.

"Well I hate Theresa May, but I don't keep going on about it." I said with a sense of finality that the conversation was getting us nowhere.

"Oh in that case I'll shut up then," she replied turning her back on me to look at her computer screen. 'I wish you would," I thought.

Then young Polly Whatis piped up and said, "That's the problem with politics, it always turns nasty," giving me the accusing stare of being the one who turned nasty.

"I won't talk then," Queen Bee continued, driving home her disgust at having been told to shut the fuck up, in a round about way...

It was a lucky escape and a lesson well learned. Its very very very dangerous to speak one's mind in a room full of brain-dead zombies.

When the insane took over the asylum

Perhaps I'm mad and its best for everyone I join the Zombie brain dead horde. But I just can't bring myself to do it. Its like forcing a heterosexual man to suck dick. It just goes against all the norm of common decency.

I'll admit I'm mad. Totally loony and bonkers. No doubt as little as twenty five years ago, I would of been carted away to the asylum and locked in a padded cell for believing everything the government told us were lies.

To be awake while the majority sleeps, puts me in a minority group, persecuted as once were the early Christians and the modern day LGBT community.

It seems I've got no other choice but to persist. Carry on and hide my true nature from the Zombie brain-dead horde.

I'll do what I can as part of the 'Resistance' and pray for the day the Zombie brain-dead wake up from their brainwashed slumbered and the Zombie Apocalypse comes to an end.

At the end of the day, I'd rather walk the path of life with the people shown in the video below, that the zombie brain-dead arse-holes who I share the corporate office with...

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

The Persecution of the Truth Movement.

The Truth Movement finds itself as the 21st Century's most persecuted minority.

Having grown in number since the 9/11 attacks, the Truth Movement is quickly becoming a persecuted minority comparable to the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender (LGBT) community.

It was only 50 years ago that homosexuality was deemed an illegal act between consenting male adults and a mere 12 years ago before being a transgender person was recognised as legal in Law.

The LGBT community suffered years of victimisation and persecution, (and still does in Muslim countries) the same of which is happening to the Truth Movement today in the UK and America.

The Truth Movement is being persecuted as once was the LGBT Community

Made up of people from all walks of life and from across the world, the Truth Movement is a collection of like-minded people who disbelieve the official narratives of government and believe what the majority of mainstream society deem as impossible. You only need to check out Youtube to watch the thousands and thousands of videos calling into question the moon landings, the shape of the Earth, the make up of space, technology, history, politics and medicine.

Take for example David Icke and Chris Spivey, both leading men in the Truth Movement. David Icke believes in a reptilian race which has existed alongside modern man, but has been ridiculed and dismissed as a loony; while Chris Spivey has been convicted of harassment for calling into question the alleged murder of Lee Rigby in Woolwich, branded a 'Twisted Conspiracy Theorist' by the UK's national newspapers.

Telling the truth is a revolutionary act

In George Orwell's classic dystopian novel 1984, he wrote, "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Nothing could be further from the truth today.

Millions of people across the world don't believe the government's version of what happened on 9/11 and 7/7. Just as the LGBT community fought for their beliefs to be adopted by society at large, the Truth community find themselves in the same position.

David Cameron shamelessly spoke at the U.N Security Council, and labelled anyone who believes there’s a global conspiracy being commanded by a Jewish cabal, as non-violent extremists. While millions of law-biding people across the world believe just that, and are thrown to the wolves labelled anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic.

The fact Chris Spivey's 2015 conviction of harassment against the family of murdered soldier Lee Rigby was upheld, equates to the government convicting a homosexual man of homosexuality.
You cannot force a homosexual man to be heterosexual; nor can you force a transgender person to conform to the gender they were born with, but in today's society, anyone who disbelieves the official government’s narrative can be branded a criminal and be persecuted and ridiculed by a compliant press.

Catch 22

In the same way you cannot force a gay man to be straight, you cannot force someone to deny their truth, once they've woken up to it. Spivey's conviction of harassing the Rigby family was upheld on the strength that Lee Rigby existed and that his murder was not a conspiracy, but Spivey and millions more, will never stop believing that Lee Rugby never actually existed and that his murder was a conspiracy.

Having come to this conclusion through research and a critical analysis of the events on the fateful day in Woolwich on May 22 2013, Spivey published his article 'The Drummer Man,' which has never been debunked. He simply conducted his research and published his findings.

While the mother of Lee Rigby, Lyn Rigby says, "It suggests that my grieving family has somehow done something wrong," the fact that Spivey suggests she has done something wrong, (with the assistance of Crown and State) reveals the Catch 22.

‘The Drummer Man’ article has never been properly investigated in a court of Law, which in itself suggests that yes indeed, something terribly wrong exists at the very heart of the British Establishment and its judicial system.

UK Blasting News Links

Why am I supporting Spivey, when he thinks I'm a fuckin arsehole?

Its only fair I answer this question from Fuck The State; (who asks why I am supporting Spivey when he thinks I'm a fuckin arsehole?) Seeing as he took the time to ask me...

In case you don't know who Chris Spivey is... Please check out the following article I wrote in 2013.

Who the fuck is Chris Spivey?
The reason I’ve taken Chris Spivey’s articles on board is because they are well crafted, articulated, researched and written. Another major factor is ...
He's been splashed across the tabloid front pages of late, having his conviction for harassing the family of murdered solider Lee Rigby, upheld at his appeal court hearing.
The UK's most controversial blogger, Chris Spivey, has lost his appeal against his 2015 conviction of harassment against the family of alleged murder of Lee Rigby...
Lyn Rigby (Lee's mum) has been making the most of the public outrage and has been lapping up the public sympathy from both the public and celebrities alike.
HOLLY Willoughby choked back tears on This Morning after Lee Rigby’s mum told how she was forced to re-live her son’s horrific killing in court. Lyn Rigby was threatened with arrest unl…
Now; to specifically answer Fuck The State's question; I'm supporting Spivey because what is happening to him affects all of us in the Truth Movement.
The Truth Movement finds itself as the 21st Century's most persecuted minority
Fuck The State is right to say that Spivey thinks I'm a fuckin arsehole. He's most recently called me a 'Gay Clown' and no doubt calls me much more behind closed doors.

We were mates once upon a time, but that was before I asked him to comment on the Hampstead Kid's case and took a more satirical view.
Wednesday, 1 April 2015. My Mate Matt.
While Grand-dad Chris Spivey is under the impression he's done much to bring the Alternative Media together, the truth couldn't be further away from the ...

The fact Spivey lost his appeal and has been convicted of harassing a crisis actor, who played a role in a staged false flag terror attack, is concern for everyone who's active in the Alternative Media/Truth Movement.

Spivey today, me tomorrow and everyone next week. So to answer Fuck The States question in full, I'm supporting Spivey because it isn't just about him, its about all of us.

And in answer to his allegation that I'm trying to ride on his coat tails; he's absolutely right...

Please show your appreciation with a donation.