Thursday, 13 October 2016

John Wanoa - Latest News

I spoke to Chief Taumata of Otaua Marae this morning and assured him as one of the 38 Marae of Taumata Kaumatua of Nga Puhi who I have expressed to them the significance of them as an Integral part of the 1835 Declaration of Independence Flag Sovereign Authority of the 8 tribes of Nga Puhi Whakameninga 1834 First British Land Contact Part of the Flag with the 8 Tribes Chiefs Pre-sold Private Contract Land at Kororareka (Russell) by British Land Agents to King William IV British Admiralty Ship of Navy Settlers and King William IV Crown Agents who arrived on 10 April 1834 with their British families from William Yard in Devon "Port: England King William IV Navy Yard and in particular the Russel Family of my Friend and Confidante Moyra Russell "Hoffman" (Direct Descendant)

And and the second part of the Declaration of Independence Flag of the Confederation of Chiefs Contract with King William IV on Waitangi Land Sold to the British Settlers already living on the land under a second British Ship of Admiralty stuck fast on Nga Puhi Ngti Kawa Land they chose at Waitangi Treaty Grounds as Pre-Sold again to the British Settlers who were already Settled under the First Contract Hapu Chiefs to King William IV in Kororareka (Russell)

So now The New Zealand NSW Government Land Titles were created from the British Titles in the Kings Bench Court having a Native Chief and a British Crown Agent linked to the New Zealand Government linked to the NSW New South Wales Government in Australia started in Sydney then to Melbourne Victoria to Canberra Presently Commonwealth of Australia Government as at 2016

The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi Agreement was haphazardly put together without an End Date and continued to this very day as a fraudulent Contract with a 1986 Constitution and its Principles adding more Fraud to that Contract Deal In 1868 and after the British Seized the Fraud Native NZ NSW Land Titles Created by the Government in Exile NZ Government in the Bay of Islands and reissued them back to the New Zealand Government under the "Manukau Land Company" British UK Real Estate Company registered in Glasgow Scotland UK

NZ Government then went under these Land Title s Direct to Britain under the British 1852 Constitution for New Zealand from Westminster Parliament UK instead of through NSW Australia where they started from in 1840 to 1868

Now because our first Contract at 10 April 2016 Land Title Contract was a British Land Title at Kororareka this forms the Basis of our Authority to use the Acts of King William IV Parliament London UK Full Reign of Authority for the Hapu Chiefs of the 8 Tribes of Nga Puhi to continue to use in an unbroken Hapu Sovereignty partnership Private Contract Business with King William IV Sovereign Monarch of England Britain UK to the 10 April 2016 and beyond until we the Administrators of his Private Contract with us change that contract and British Dual British UK Moai Crown Hapu Government Agreement with the King of England inside his Kings Bench Court of Admiralty in Plymouth England and on his "William Yard" Ancestral Land at Devon Port Naval Base where the Settlers of Kororateka (Russell) Bay of Islands came from in the first place

I am holding all these Documents and Doctrines of Discovery Title of the British King William IV Crown Agents for the British UK Government original "Ututaonga Native Land Title" Instruments of the Waitangi Land Blocks given to me by Hare Ututaonga the One House in the whole Bay of Islands Farm Land area

And hold the original "British Manukau Native Land Title " Instruments in Helensville Auckland Waikato area and the whole of New Zealand Title right here as the "Moai Crown" King William IV Memorial Land Commissioner Appointed by these Confederation of Chiefs Members 1985 President "Mohi Manukau" Founder. "and his Committee Del Wihongi "Hare Ututaonga" "Matiu Tarawa" "Rihari Kake" Amato Akarana Dan Davis" "Maiti Tahere" and others I have not named I worked closest to Mohi Manukau and Hare Ututaonga and outside of this Group Chief Kingi Taurua Te Tii Marae

That forms a basis of preparations for the 28th October Confederation of Chiefs 182 Years of Continuity of their Hapu Sovereignty with King William IV British Immigrant Settlers still in occupation of our Hapu Native Lands under Moai Crown King William IV Creditor Land Commissioner Mo`ai Crown King William IV Bank of England British Crown Westminster Parliament UK Private Contract of King William IV Admiralty Kings Bench Court Martial Law Authority Jurisdiction Legally linking to our Moai Crown Commonwealth Government of the World with this 1834 Flag Sovereign State Government Law Jurisdiction 1835 Constitution Law L`and Laws of England and Acts of Westminster Parliament 1830 to 1837 enforced in the Waitangi Marae Kings Bench Court 15 April 2016 for the Records Matt Taylor in England Jackie Littlergordon in Scotland and Daryl Payn and Rene Powers in California USA.

Taylor v's Spivey: A Special Report by Matt Taylor

Brian Setchfield once said that I'm better than Chris Spivey because I don't swear!

Following on from the success of Katy Bourne v's Matt Taylor, the ultimate show down needs to be addressed, Matt Taylor v's Chris Spivey!
In his recent article 'So where does that leave Madeleine?', Spivey makes a point of pointing out the 'ego's' of those who dare to question his research, by saying:

"Course, those who have been denouncing me lately with comments about how I have lost the plot, or I have been blackmailed into using these photo comparisons, or I am working for MI5, all fall into two groups. Group A. Those who think that they are so wide awake and egotistical that anything passed their point of understanding must be bullshit..... Lose the ego fellas, you have an awful long journey to travel yet. Group B. GCHQ paid/blackmailed trolls desperately trying to make me look a laughing stock because I have nearly cracked how the monsters game plan works... Fuck off from my website you sewer dwelling scabby nonce cunts."

With a readership in it's millions, I'm mere plankton, compared to the Blue Whale sized support he commands.

During my heyday (see the links below); my readership briefly touched a million a month, but having reduced my contribution to the Alternative Media to a minimum, my readership has since plummeting to a hundred or so people who read my blogs on a daily basis.

Spivey beats me hands down, he's without doubt the 'TOP DOG' when it comes to readership numbers.
But the question needs to be asked; what have we achieved?

Chris Spivey is keen to boast that his research is rock solid; as he say's himself, "It is indisputable and impossible to debunk."

But regardless of the substance, has it made a difference?

The 'Powers that Shouldn't Be' are still in charge. They are still free and they are still continuing to implement their evil agenda of deception, mass murder and corruption.

As far as I'm aware Spivey has failed to bring about any detectable change, (except for the Daily Mail printing stories which contradict those which Spivey writes about), where as I've managed to get the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) to launch an investigation into Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne.
Without 'losing my ego', is it fair to say I've brought about change, where as Spivey hasn't?

Its all well and good writing about deep secret conspiracies, but if no one can get their heads around it to understand it, is it even worth it?

Its all very well Spivey encouraging his readers to go to their local police stations to report crimes based on his research, but if his readers cannot understand what he writes or are unable to get their heads around the enormity of the conspiracy which Spivey claims to have uncovered, then what is the point?

He writes, "I have given you more than enough indisputable evidence that extreme, organized crime is being committed..... So report it. In fact I think that it is an offence not to. And when I say report it, I don't mean email your PCC enclosing a link to this or other articles... Indeed, that will get you nowhere. Course, by all means print off any relevant information to include as proof but you must report your allegation in person at your local police station.... Do not be fobbed off. You are a British citizen reporting an extremely serious crime that is occurring on British soil. Don't just sit back and leave it to others, that ain't going to work because you can bet your fucking life that those 'others' will be doing the same as you."

"Do not be fobbed off."

There is one subject which Spivey dares not comment on and that's the Hampstead Kids. He's continually refused to publicly state whether he believes the Hampstead Kids, or if he thinks they are lying, coached to say what they've said by an evil mother and boyfriend intent on ruining the reputation of Ricky Dearman, and smearing the Hampstead community.

I became involved in the Alternative Media because I thought it was the best vehicle to expose the truth and rid the world of the liars and cheats who occupy seats of power and authority across the globe.

Sadly my faith in the Alternative Media crumbled to dust after the Alternative Media's leading personalities, turned on the Hampstead kids by calling them liars.

This was the break-through we were waiting for, a story we could all champion and expose together.

I asked Chris Spivey a very simple question: Do you believe the Hampstead kids? To which I got this convoluted answer:

Subject: RE: Hampstead
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:08:07 +0000
Hello Matthew,
I trust you are well and that you have your financial and accommodation problems sorted out now.
Matthew, this is your second email to me in less than 24 hours, the first of which you began:
"I'm sorry I've been a pain but I just need to know what you think about the Hampstead case".
You then go on to demand a yes or no answer to whether I believe the "Hampstead kids".
Yet when I don't jump to attention and get back to you straight away you revert to being a pain in the arse and send a follow up email, again demanding a yes or no answer as to my position on the "Hampstead kids".
Therefore you lied to me because you are not sorry for being a pain in the arse.
Moreover, whilst being a pain in the arse you quote me as saying in a "recent article": if anyone disbelieves the Hampstead kids they must either be - A troll. A fool. Reluctant to step out of their comfort zone.
Yet I have never ever written any such thing Matthew!
I also feel that I should point out to you that in your capacity as the "daddy of the Alternative Media" mine and anyone elses position on any given story should not matter a jot to you. Indeed, as the "daddy" you surely lead and fuck what anyone else thinks about anything... You do however need to work on your hardman act because you actually come across as a bit gay.
Nevertheless, for all you know Matthew I might have written an article on the "Hampstead kids" since you no longer have any interest in what I write - In fact I believe that your exact words were::
"Well, that’s made my mind up for sure! That’s the last Spivey article I’m going to read. What a fucking waste of time that was".
And surely you are a man of your word Matthew?
However, just to recap:
Whilst pursuing a course of conduct tantamount to harassment 
You demonstrate your lack of integrity by lying to me whilst being a right pain in the arse and accusing me of writing statements that I haven't yet feel you have the right to demand a personal audience with me as befits your superior standing in the Alternative Media, despite coming across as a bit of a gay clown who no longer has any interest in what I have to say on anything
And with that being the case, I feel a more business like approach is needed.
Therefore my terms are as follows:
A straight yes or no answer...................... £100
A detailed summary................................. £500
Terms are non-negotiable, Payment is in advance.
Don't thank me.

Spivey is happy to waste 458 letters when two or three letters would have sufficed...

Talk about gratitude?

I've written more about Chris Spivey than any else I know. On the whole, I like to think everything I've written about him is fair, balanced and true.

Where-as other people like Kevin Boyle (for example) isn't so kind or forgiving. 
In all probability I've given Chris Spivey thousands of pounds worth of free publicity, and when I ask for a simply yes or not answer, to a very simply question, I get told:

My terms are as follows:
A straight yes or no answer.......................... £100
A detailed summary..................................... £500

Talk about gratitude?

Everything you always wanted to know about Chris Spivey, but were afraid to ask:
There are only a few leading men left in the Alternative/Truth movement.

Richard D Hall leads the way with his ground-breaking Rich Planet TV Show which continues to expose serious wrong-doing in government and media; the latest of which is his Didcot exposure, which calls into question the police's verdict of Jed Allen being a 'Wolverine obsessed' fan guilty of murdering his family.

Miles Johnson who organizes the Bases conferences is doing sterling work in exposing deep dark secrets of the military and black op organizations, blazing the way in highlighting the murder of 'Super Solider' Max Spiers earlier this year.

James Corbett of the Corbett Report continues to lead the way in how one man can deliver a professional and ground-breaking news service from a spare bedroom.

To John Paterson who is involved in the Royal Commission to expose corruption in government, to Brian Setchfield who is putting himself forward as the alternative PM to Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn.

The leading men in the Alternative Media are spread thin to the ground.

(Please feel free to correct me: Unlike Chris Spivey my thought's and opinions are open to challenge. If you believe someone needs mentioning due to their sterling work in the Alternative movement, please let me know.)

I remember the good old days, when I couldn't say boo to a goose, without the likes of Danielle La Verite and her legion of sycophant minions jumping on the band-wagon to shout, leer and throw rotten tomatoes at me.

Take for example what Tony Sayers said in response to one of my Matt's News videos published on the 3rd April 2015:

  • Tony Sayers: Ha ha I need a fucking good laugh! He's a bit special isn't he?
  • Danielle La Verite: Bloody Petrifying
Tony Sayers has since been exposed as a psychopathic sexual predator.
Or when wannabe pirate Kai Bowman warned me that he will not be bated.
  • Kai Bowman: Matt Taylor! I will not be bated into a trap, I wondered what your next game play would be. I didn't reply because I seriously questioned your sanity.
Or when Danielle La Verite used to threaten me with all sorts of things:
  • Terry Colbeck: Think he's picked a fight with the wrong person here he'll be taken down like others have
  • Danielle La verite: Oh he has. Believe me. I'll just have him done for harassment, malicious communication, stalking and then I'll sue him
  • Nicola Johnson: What an ugly cunt he is looks like a brick has met his face a few times already
While the best was when Danielle La Verite really went to town on me
  • Danielle La Verite: Matt Taylor, I'm warning you officially now. Back the fuck off from me and my friends. We all know what your agenda is. One more word and you'll have a libel case so far up your arse you'll be bummed by Michael Clarke Duncan You don't get 2 warnings.

God I miss the good old days!

I remember with fond memories how Patrick Henningsen berated me for always making lists! When Ian R Crane called me a 'maverick' and 'a loose cannon', when Spivey called me a 'Gay Clown' and Danielle La Verite called me a 'Genius', only to swiftly change her mind and call me a 'cunt' instead!

The fond memories of Lisa Pea having a go at me for having a go at Spivey and the likes of Thomas Sheridan and everyone at UK Column News blocking me from engaging in any further conversation.

Everything has changed since the heady days of 2015 when the Alternative Media was in full swing. We were close to changing the world, but then the Hampstead Kids told us their story and the Alternative Media collapsed in on itself and its never been the same again.

Big hitter Thomas Sheridan was the first to come out and lambast the Hampstead kids's testimony as lies, which consequently resulted in all his fans doing the same, because none of them wanted to be seen disagreeing with their almighty cult leader.

Danielle La Verite, who at the time was a rising star in the Alternative Media, followed suit and called the Hampstead kids liars too.

To be honest; I was dumb-founded... My spirit was broken and my opinion of the Alternative Media has never been the same again.

But I digress...

The point I want to make is, have either of us (Spivey and I) made any damn difference to the world around us?

I'm as human as the next human and my ego is the same as everyone else. I'd admit that I'm still fuming over how Spivey answered my question about the Hampstead Kids. I'm certainly not demanding a "personal audience" with him as he suggests, I'm just looking for a yes or no answer!

By God, when I ask the question and HELL broke loose.

Spivey has an opinion on everything else; I still don't understand why he hasn't given his opinion about the Hampstead kids. After-all, it is the biggest story to hit the Alternative Media in a life-time.

Spivey could have the whole country reading his blog but if nothing changes, what's the point?

Sunday, 9 October 2016

John Paterson & Brian Setchfield on Andy Peacher's radio show - Thursday 6 Oct 2016

Exposing Corporate Frauds and Bringing Down the Chain Of Command Within the Lies Corruption Money Laundering and much more.
Freedom Talk Radio Listener based award-winning community radio station serving The Highlands Of Scotland and the towns and villages within the Caithness And Sutherland Areas.
Our name comes from Freedom Talk Liberty Justice. We broadcast Talk Radio hit music from the last 50 years plus specialist programmes, news and local community information, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Unlike commercial radio, Freedom Talk Radio is a community station.
This means we are a non-profit organisation. We are here to inform and entertain the people about how to avoid the injustices of the world as well as playing an active part in the community and providing training opportunities.

Thursday, 6 October 2016

Join Will Black TOMORROW Fri Oct 7 for his 3 hour #AcousticRock Show Live Stream on Facebook

3 Hour #AcousticRock Show Live Stream

TOMORROW Friday Oct 7 @ 2 PM EST / 7 PM UK
Hi Matt :)

Please join me tomorrow online when I'll be performing a special 3 hour live stream show on Facebook. This is where I get to perform your favourite rock songs on acoustic guitar by request.

I've just recently started streaming my shows from the new Facebook Live service and the response has been incredible.

Show starts 2 PM EST / 7 PM UK.

I'll also be talking up my premiere fan service 'The Inner Circle' where I offer tons of exclusive content not available anywhere else.

This live stream show is free to watch for everyone on Facebook and is accessible from all mobile devices and desktop computers.

Broadcast begins streaming live at 2 PM EST / 7 PM UK.

Thanks and I hope to see you in the chat room with your song requests tomorrow! WB
Read more: Will Black Rocks the UK Again!

Tuesday, 4 October 2016

Shoreham Air-Show cover-up? A Special Report by Matt Taylor

Cover up : Noun
1. an attempt to prevent people discovering the truth about a serious mistake or crime.

There can be no denying there is a cover-up in place to hide the truth about the Shoreham air-show crash.

Its not a conspiracy theory, it's happened.

High Court ruling: Police refused access to pilot statements over Shoreham Airshow crash.

An attempt to prevent Sussex Police discovering the truth about a serious mistake or crime on the 22 August 2015, at the Shoreham air-show, has been made after The High Court refused Sussex Police access to records held by the Air Accident Investigations Branch (AAIB), about what happened on that fateful day.

Specifically; Sussex Police are being prevented to know exactly what the pilot, Andrew Hill said in the moments after the crash, and what the data from the flight recorder revealed. The Chief Constable of Sussex Police, Giles York has been granted a copy of the cockpit footage, which former AAIB investigator Phil Giles says will provide the police with enough information to conclude their investigation.

With the public left scratching their heads as to why the AAIB are keeping crucial evidence secret, Sussex Police appear to totally understand. Detective Chief Inspector Paul Rymarz said, "We accept the reasons why our request has not been granted in full."

But the public are none the wiser

A spokesman for AAIB said, “The AAIB is not able to release protected air accident investigation records of its own accord. Only the High Court can allow for their release. We note today’s judgment and will now release the film footage to the Chief Constable of Sussex Police.” 

As the comments from the public point out:
  • "Eleven people died in this awful event. This is a further insult to them and their families. No doubt legal arguments have been devoid of all common sense."
While some members of the public are left guessing as to why Andrew Hill's comments immediately after the crash are not being used in evidence:
  • "I'm guessing that these statements were taken without a caution being given. The pilot has rights, as does any other defendant in a potential criminal investigation."
  • "Your right. But "Unsolicited" comments made outside of caution can also be used too! Especially if there is admission of guilt or innocence."
The general consensus from the public is:
  • "What a shame that the ultimate truth cannot be heard."
  • "Surprised the High Court haven't allowed a viewing of the material to check it as it is relevant to the case(s) being investigated."
  • "Awful decision...... any evidence withheld could effect the outcome of an inquest , or criminal trial. the police should have authority to gain any evidence required to get the truth of what happened in shoreham. the grieving families deserve to know the truth..." 
Even Andy McDonald, the Shadow Secretary for Transport, said:
  • "It is deeply concerning investigating police officers should be hindered in this way. They should have access to any materials necessary to bring justice to the families of those who tragically lost their lives. Far too often families find themselves in an uphill struggle to establish the facts of what happened to their loved ones."

Andrew Hill - The Miracle Man

Mystery has surrounded the Shoreham air-show crash from the very out-set. Just how Andrew Hill miraculously survived the immense fire-ball without a cut or a graze is a miracle.

At the time the AAIB report said the aircraft broke into four main pieces which came to rest close together approximately 243m from the initial ground contact, in a shallow overgrown depression to the south of the A27.

The report goes on to say that investigators are not sure whether Mr Hill attempted to eject from the craft or was forcibly removed due to the significant impact. Investigators wrote: ‘During the initial part of the impact sequence the jettisonable aircraft canopy was released, landing in a tree close to the main aircraft wreckage. During the latter part of the impact sequence, both the pilot and his seat were thrown clear from the cockpit.'

Andrew Hill has been at the centre of the police investigation into the Shoreham Air-show disaster which claimed the lives of 11 men one year ago.

He spent weeks in an induced coma but miraculously survived and has since made a full recovery.

He was first spotted on his feet again last October when he was pictured walking in jeans and denim shirt, carrying a water bottle.

Police interviewed him under caution last December. He was not arrested. Then five months after the August 22 tragedy, images emerged of him driving a £40,000 Porsche Boxster.

Andrew Hill
Having already uncovered a cover-up involving Sussex Police, it comes as no surprise that they find themselves embroiled in another. 

Camber Sands Tragedy - A Cover-up? - A Special Report by Matt Taylor

The country's leading conspiracy researcher Chris Spivey has been vocal in his belief that the Shoreham air-show crash was a false flag event in the same league as the 7/7 London bombing, the Woolwich murder and the Paris attacks.

He said in his article "The Shoreham Plane Crash Part 1" dated 09 September 2015

Chris Spivey
"The Shoreham plane crash is without doubt the most easily pulled apart government hoax that I have investigated to date.
Indeed, it would seem that the more ambitious the hoaxes get, the more the script writers have to try and shore the old fanny up with the usual tell tale signs that point to a fraud having been committed – which is a bit of a Catch 22 situation for them really.
Mind you, it is no exaggeration to say that the Shoreham Flight Shite needed a lot of shoring up and as such every single indicator of a government hoax had to be brought into play… Or at least it did in their minds.
But all the same, having said that I also have to say that the hoax was a mighty ambitious project by anyones standards – especially going on their past Am-Dram efforts – and indeed, it must doubtlessly have taken an awful lot of planning as well as having been a logistical nightmare to set up."

In light of Chris Spivey's allegations that not everything is what it seems, I asked Sussex Police to comment on his allegations and this is how they responded:

Dear Matthew,
I write in connection with your request for information relating to Shoreham Air Show.
I can confirm your request has now been considered and I am not obliged to supply the information you have requested. 
Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Sussex Police, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you the applicant with a notice which:   
(a) states that fact, 
(b) specifies the exemption in question; and 
(c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.
The exemptions applicable to the information refused are;
Section 30 - Investigations and proceedings conducted by the Public authority. 
Section 30 is a class based qualified exemption and there is a requirement to consider the public interest to ensure neither confirming or denying information is held is appropriate.
Overall Harm in Confirming or Denying that Information is held
Modern-day policing is intelligence led which is particularly pertinent with regard to any current investigation.  The National Intelligence Model is adhered to by all police forces across England and Wales.  It is a business process with an intention to provide focus to operational policing and to achieve a disproportionately greater impact from the resources applied to any problem.  It is dependant on a clear framework of analysis of information and intelligence allowing a problem solving approach to law enforcement crime prevention techniques.  To confirm whether or not Sussex Police  has carried out a specific investigation  would undermine the ongoing operation..
The prevention and detection of crime is the foundation upon which policing is built.  The Police Service has a clear responsibility to prevent crime and arrest those responsible for committing crime or those than plan to commit crime.  By confirming whether or not a specific line of enquiry has been used could directly influence the stages of that process, jeopardise current investigations, HM Coroner’s investigation, prejudice future law enforcement, the judicial process and any subsequent civil proceedings.
In order to fully investigate incidents it is vital that the police have the ability to work together, where necessary covertly, to obtain intelligence within current legislative frameworks to assist in the investigative process to ensure the successful arrest and prosecution of offenders who have committed offences.
Section 30
Factors favouring complying with Section 1(1)(a) confirming that information is held
Confirming or denying that information exists relevant to this request would lead to a better informed public improving their knowledge and understanding of the investigatory process and may encourage individuals to provide intelligence in order to assist with investigations and reduce crime which could assist with the apprehension and prosecution of offenders, as all police investigations are publicly funded, confirmation that information is held would provide transparency with regard to the allocation of force budgets.
This in turn would highlight where police resources are being targeted and the public are entitled to know how public funds are spent, particularly in the current economic climate.
Factors against complying with Section 1(1)(a) confirming or denying that any other information is held
Confirmation that information is held would prejudice how investigations are carried out in the future by revealing details of investigative activity.  This would hinder the prevention and detection of crime and affect Sussex Police law enforcement capabilities.  Confirmation would also undermine the partnership approach to investigations. To disclose where these investigations are being undertaken to the world would seriously undermine the prevention or detection of crime and the force’s future law enforcement capabilities.
Balancing Test
The points above highlight the merits of confirming or denying whether information pertinent to this request exists.  The Police Service is charged with enforcing the law, preventing and detecting crime and protecting the communities we serve.  As part of that policing purpose, various tactical tools may be used to gather information relating to high profile investigative activity.
Weakening the mechanisms used to monitor any investigative activity and specifically current and ongoing investigations could weaken that process.
In addition any disclosure by Sussex Police that places an investigation at risk, no matter how generic, would undermine any trust or confidence individuals have in us.  Therefore, at this moment in time, it is our opinion that for these issues the balance test favours neither confirming nor denying that information exists.
No inference can be drawn from this refusal that information is or isn’t held.
Yours sincerely
Roger Brace
FOI Officer 

Or in other words; its none of your business and we wouldn't tell you anyway!

"The Shoreham plane crash is without doubt the most easily pulled apart government hoax that I have investigated to date."

While Chris Spivey contends that the people who died that day were MI5 constructs and that the whole event was a staged event for reasons not yet fully understood; others like leading ufologist Richard Lennie and astrophotographer John Walson, pointed the blame to a UFO collision.

Read more: UFO causes Shoreham Air-Show Crash

Sussex Police were quick to reply to the UFO crash theory by saying how "very grateful" they were for the information, but not so forthcoming when accused of being involved in a cover-up. (of which it appears they are becoming quite adapt in doing so.)

Make no mistakes, a cover-up is in full swing and everyone knows it.

Even local MP's are calling for changes to the law after hearing that Sussex police were refused access to potentially crucial information about the cause of the Shoreham Airshow crash.

Brighton Pavilion MP and joint Leader of the Green Party Caroline Lucas said: "This judgment appears to hinder a crucial police investigation into this tragic incident, and it could set a worrying precedent. We need an open justice system that best learns from the past and prevents tragedies like this occurring."

While Portslade and Hove Labour MP, Peter Kyle said "We are testing the boundaries of this law but that shouldn’t prohibit giving the families of victims the justice they need. If they can’t sort this out then maybe the law needs to be re-examined."

Unrelenting in his goal of covering up what actually happened that day, Justice Singh said allowing police access to the statements made by Andy Hill would cause a “serious and obvious chilling effect which would tend to deter people from answering questions by the AAIB with the candour which is necessary. This would seriously hamper future accident investigations and protection of public safety by the learning of lessons which may help prevent similar accidents.”

He also denied access to details of experiments and tests because the reports were likely to be made public in the AAIB’s final findings and because there was “no reason why the police could not themselves investigate”.

James Healy-Pratt, the head of aviation at Stewarts Law lawyer who is representing six victims' families, welcomed the judgment as a "significant development" which he hoped would speed up the investigation.

He added: "There are no real surprises here and this is the expected result."

Detective Chief Inspector Paul Rymarz from Sussex Police said the ruling would allow his team to progress the investigation, adding: "We understand legally this case is without precedent in England and Wales and we accept the reasons why our request has not been granted in full."

"As we have said before, this is an extraordinarily complex investigation, but we remain committed to finding answers for the families and friends of those who died."

The very fact the AAIB have with-held information which Sussex Police went to the High Court to release, tells us the power struggle which is going on behind the scenes. As the Queen herself once alluded to; there are dark forces at work in this country of which the public have little or no knowledge about.

In much the same way that six healthy fit young men do not drown in rip-tides off Camber Sands, so too, doesn't a pilot survive unscathed from an infernal fire ball which disintegrates his plane and kills 11 men on the ground.

The AAIB know the truth but they aren't telling us.

Be it a UFO collision or a false flag event; there is a cover-up in full swing regarding the Shoreham air-show crash and that's a fact!

Further Reading:

Camber Sands Tragedy - A Cover-up? - A Special Report by Matt Taylor
Read more: UFO causes Shoreham Air-Show Crash
The Shoreham Plane Crash: Part 1

Sunday, 2 October 2016

The Sirens off Brighton's Palace Pier; A Special Report by Matt Taylor

With the death toil mounting, Brighton's Palace Pier is being tarnished with the unenviable title of 'Britain's Death Pier.'

A cursory Google search reveals a disturbing catalogue of deaths off Brighton's Premier Tourist Attraction.
Deaths off Brighton Pier go back centuries.

Bearing in mind that during the 5th century when Brighton was a small Saxon village called Beorthelm's Tun, the shoreline stretched well out to sea, further than where the present pier ends. Victim of sea erosion, a 13th century writer once recorded that the sea had swallowed 40 acres of farmland.

While modern day coroners are quick to apportion blame to suicides and tragic accidents, a more sinister reason swims silently and stealthily between the sea-weed covered foundation struts of Brighton's Palace Pier.

Part woman part fish, Siren's are the evil cousins of the much loved and adored mermaids. Sirens are beautiful but dangerous creatures that lure sailors with their beautiful voice to their doom, causing their ships to crash on the reefs near their islands.

According to Greek mythology, the Sirens are daughters of the river god Achelous, famous as companions of Persephone, daughter of goddess Demeter. Demeter gave them wings in order to protect her daughter, but after Persephone's abduction by Hades (brother of Zeus and Poseidon, Lord of the Underworld and Ruler of the Dead) Demeter cursed them.

First part woman part fish, to part woman part fish part bird, Siren's were mentioned by Homer in Odysseus, intent on luring Ulysses and his companions to their ruin, Circe advised the sailors to plug their ears with wax to counter-act their deadly seductive melodies; to The Argonauts, who successfully evaded their clutches by drowning out their mesmerizing music with the sweeter tunes of Orpheus. The siren's song is a beautiful yet sad melody, rumoured to be the eternal calling for Perephone's return.

With the death toil hitting double figures, and with the on-set of autumn threatening to raise the death toil even higher, the implausible scenario of Siren's living underneath Brighton's Pier is all the more plausible.

Isn't it funny that women don't jump off the pier or get pulled into the treacherous sea?  

As in the days long gone, the Siren's only target the men. With so many victims to prey on, both at the shore's edge and hanging over the pier's railings, the Siren's off Brighton enjoy rich and easy pickings.

The lonely man, drunk on beer and whiskey, roaming randomly along the beach and singing to the shining moon or drunkenly hanging over the rails of the pier. Then he hears a beautiful voice. Sweet mesmerizing and seductive. Coaxing him to come further and surrender to the impulse of the moment. The man would attempt to fight the temptation, not knowing where the intoxicating sounds are coming from. But then looking deep into the dark rolling waters of the sea, he feasts his eyes upon beauty. A beautiful lady beckoning him in, singing a song of which there is no escape.

Once his eyes lock with the intense stare of a Siren, there is no way back. Up and over he jumps. In he wades. Death awaits him within the cold wet grasp of the Sirens embrace.

Not just one but three

With their territory stretching from the Peacehaven cliffs to Worthing beach, there could be three Siren sisters living a clandestine existence patrolling off the Brightonian coast.

Beware the Starlings
With 40,000 starlings flocking across Brighton's coastal sky-line, its easy to imagine the Siren's dominion over the sea and sky.

Brighton is famous for it's amazing spectacle of Starlings flocking like shoals of fish in the evening sky. People come from miles away to watch the mesmerizing experience, oblivious that they are watching the Siren's in their alternative form.

Beware this autumn and winter as your look out to sea from Palace Pier and beware where the waves lap the shore. If you hear sweet music it may be too late, the Siren's would have got you, no more to your fate.

Further Reading:

Please show your appreciation with a donation.