Friday, 25 September 2015

SATAN RITUAL ABUSE OF SCHOOL CHILDREN IN HAMPSTEAD.

Sourced from: http://www.youthinkitsajoke.com/satanic-ritual-abuse-of-school-children-in-hampstead/

In late 2014, a video emerged on the internet of two young children claiming that they had been sexually abused by their father and that he was the head of a Satanic sex cult based in Hampstead, North London. In the video the children are being quizzed by their mother Ella Draper and her partner Abraham Christie who made the recording as a safety precaution after the children explained their ordeal. The brother and sister insist they are passed around a satanic sex cult which consists of teachers, classmates, parents, social works and many more. Their father Ricky Dearman is accused of being the leader of the cult and forces the children to sacrifice imported babies and then drink their blood. The harrowing claims continue with dancing around baby skulls, shoes made from the babies flesh and much much more. The claims are so elaborate and detailed that they could not have made them up or be forced to remember them.

Bearing that in mind, in the later section entitled ‘The police interviews’, you will see that the children eventually (after a week of being in care and 3 interviews later) retract their allegations and say they made it up. How did they think up such an elaborate story I hear you ask? Well apparently they got it all from watching the ‘Mask of Zoro’ along with a friend at school who looks at plastic willies on her iPad. Wow. Do you honestly believe that?

The Children who are both under the age of 10 go in to incredible detail as they explain to their mother that the abuse had been occurring since they were babies and their father was the head of a Satanic cult based in the extremely wealthy North London suburb of leafy Hampstead. They accuse their father of forcing them to chop the heads off euthanized babies that had been trafficked into the country via various members of the cult. After the beheadings they would drain the blood and drink it from a goblet, while saving the bones for later use. The story they relay is very detailed and they consistently give the same answers ever time they are questioned. One of the most important things to remember about this story, is that the children describe numerous tattoos, piercing and distinctive markings of their abusers, which include the Headteacher of their school Katy Forsdyke.

The original confession videos.

Lets start by taking a look at the original confession video that surfaced in 2014.

(Video removed from Youtube)


Ok, so that was pretty scary stuff. After recording these videos and while still on holiday, the mothers partner Abraham contacted his brother Johm Clemont, whom was a police Sargent in South London. His brother advised them to return to the UK and to come straight him upon arrival. They family done what the brother had advised and went straight to his after flying back to England. The brother began passing on information to his superiors but felt that something was wrong as he was not getting the responses he was expecting. The family decided to leave the brothers house and return to London where they reported the case straight to social services.

The Police Interviews.

Ella was taken into custody by the police and the children were sneakily separated from her at the police station. She has not seen the children since.

Below are the original police interview tapes made of the children when they were first brought to the police station in September 2014. There are so many weird things about these interviews that just don’t make sense, like the interviews strange tones of voice, body actions and obsessions over the smaller insignificant facts. The first video will show Three interviews carried out with the boy. One on the night they were taken in care, one two days after and one taken a whole week after being in care. In the first two interviews, the boy’s story is consistent, accurate and informative, as is the second interview. However, after being in care for a week and then re interviewed for the third time, they boy retracts the whole claim and says he made it all up. The girls account is the same.


The Media Blackout.

When the confession video first appeared on the internet it went viral, but the mainstream media remained suspiciously quiet doing everything in its power to avoid the whole situation. The first article that surfaced was in the daily mail and was a smear campaign against the mother and her partner saying they are a couple of crazies that they had coaxed the children into making up this story to tarnish their fathers name due to a custody battle. This is complete rubbish as the father gave up custody rights a few years earlier when he was arrested for nearly beating Ella to death. The case was quickly and quietly ushered through the royal courts of justice with no police investigation, use of evidence witness statements. The Judge, Justice Pauffly whom, deemed the allegations baseless and that anybody supporting the children’s claims are evil. So as a bid to finally put the story to rest, the BBC done a special, heavily controlled interview with Ricky Dearman. They didn’t publicize the interview and played it at a time when most people would be at work.

Now. If your smart, there is some information given by Dearman in the first few minutes of the interview that proves inconclusively that the whole story has been covered up from the beginning. Ricky Dearman is asked by the interviewer “How did you find out about the allegations?” when Ricky replies, “I can’t remember exactly, I think I got a call from social services advising me to get a lawyer and that I should get himself down to the local police station”. Now I ask you, what is the standard procedure for sexual abuse allegations made by children? I thought the police are supposed to turn up at the house, kick the front door in, handcuff you and take you down to the police station for questioning. The property would then be searched and any evidence secured. So… getting a nice cosey little phone call asking you politely to come to the police station seems VERY strange to me. Anyways, lets see the interview.


Who is Ricky Dearman?

Well, one ting is for sure, Ricky Dearman is sheer evil. The Hampstead Research organisation has been been setup by regular people exclusively to investigate this case as the police failed to. The organisation has found many great pieces of evidence relating to the case including the information that Ricky Dearman owns his own internet servers and various websites which he seems to be methodically deleting. It is believed that he has child porn websites also located on these servers and could be selling images.

Ricky Dearman is an aspiring actor and has a showreel on YouTube. A showreel is a series of short scenes planned and financed by an aspiring actor. Just like how a model has a portfolio of shot, an unheard of actor needs a showreel. Let’s look a Ricky’s showreel, bearing in mind that Ricky gets to dictate the everything about the script and the scene.


So after learning that Dearman want’s to be an actor and loves playing a short tempered killer, the BBC interview discussed previously might start making sense. You see in the BBC interview that he exaggerates his emotions too much, takes abnormally long pauses even tries forcing himself to cry but completely fails. It’s all rigged folks and Dearman was thoroughly enjoying every part of the interview, sowing off his fine acting skills.

Interview with the mother and partner.

The mother and her partner fled the UK as they were in fear for their lives. They managed to find safety and conduct a skype interview, explaining how it all began and how it transpired into the one of the biggest cover ups in recent history – rivalling the recent Jimmy Savile scandal. Below is an interview conducted by a county judge in America whom has taken an interest in the story.


Friends like us – the facebook connections.

As mentioned before, a group of truth seekers and concerned citizens banded together to form the Hampstead Research organization, dedicated to investigation the case of the WhistleBlower kids. The organization released a number of videos where they investigate various aspects of the people involved. As you will see for yourself, they find a lot of interesting information that points towards the fact that the kids are telling the truth. A quick YouTube search will bring up other “connection” videos including info on the Shoe and lock shop mentioned by the children.


Conclusion.

If your still deciding what to believe, then you need to go back and start again. THIS REALLY HAPPENED. there is no doubt in my mind. Here’s a few things to consider:
  1. The detailed description of tattoos, piercings and markings that can be found around the intimate body parts of the abusers. To this date, none of the 90+ people accused have come forward to clear their name.
  2. The official reports from the medial exam carried out on the children CONFIRM molestation was carried out over a prolonged period of time.
  3. There was absolutely no investigation into the named abusers and no evidence seized.
This is not the first time children have made these allegations. This has been a taboo topic for centuries but the Whistleblower kids done a great job in helping show the world that this stuff does exist and needs to be stopped. Satanic ritual abuse is alot closer to home than you think and is not something reserved solely for horror movies.

The children were illegally taken from their mother by Barnett police and have remained in care since September 2014. There has been a grass roots movements to reunite them with their loving grandparents in the Ukraine but this has been met with stiff opposition.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE try and keep updated with this situation as there is always new information being brought to light. You can do this by subscribing to the Hampstead Research blog in the link below. A huge thank you to Sabine McNeill, Belinda McKenzie and all the others at Hampstead Researchers who have dedicated their own time, money and safety to expose this cult. We pray for the children and again thank them for their courage and bravery. We hope that soon they can return to their loving mother and try to live a long and happy life in Jesus’ name.

A final thought from retired Police Detective Sargent Ray Savage.


Thursday, 24 September 2015

JOHN WANOA'S FINAL WARNING TO POPE FRANCIS, QUEEN ELIZABETH II & PRESIDENT OBAMA.


"Pope Francis, this is a notice of warning against you the third party illegal alien person and all persons as fraudsters in your Jesuit Order Catholic Church. Usurping King William IV Admiralty Court Martial Law while we are his main Contract Partner Inheritor of his Kings Bench Royal Revenue and Laws on England Soil Land Laws of England that Moai King William V Surrogate King of Hanover has the first Claims of King William IV Admiralty Court Martial Law as his Private Contract and Commercial Trading Bank of England Britain UK Legitimate Legal Authority Common Law and Moai Crown Gods Lore Business Partner."

John Wanoa: Moai King William V Surrogate King of Hanover
22 September 2015


Friday, 18 September 2015

CHRIS SPIVEY GETS TROLLED OVER FAKE SHOREHAM AIR-CRASH SHOW.











Its interesting to note Jordon Striker created this Facebook account purely to troll Chris Spivey; evident by the fact he has no friends to speak of.











You've been Trolled...
Jordon Striker's Profile Picture























READ MORE:







Friday, 11 September 2015

MATT TAYLOR RATTLES HIS CAGE written by Royal T. Twat.

Fantasist Matt Taylor, claiming to be the Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner has publicly declared that if elected the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner in 2016, he would sack the Chief Constable of Sussex Police force Giles York with immediate effect.


Labelled a “self serving snake” and “court jester” by Nailtown Slim aka Snerper, Matt Taylor, once considered a leading writer in the alternative media has come under sustained criticism for publicly deriding the work of granddad Chris Spivey, himself recently found guilty of harassment against the family of murdered solider Lee Rigby in a Chelmsford court last month.

Wednesday, 9 September 2015

SUSSEX POLICE SHOULD HAVE A GOOD LOOK AT THEMSELVES.


Talk about looking after your own! Sussex Police certainly aren't. Two rookie police officers get sent to a scene from hell and they naively take a selfie with the hash-tag “Human Barbecue.”

Now considering police officers are routinely sent to scrape up dead bodies from the ground, it isn't wonder they share gallows humour between themselves.

We know that every emergency serviceman and woman who attended the scene of the Shoreham air-crash were offered counselling to deal with the horrors they had to face.

If the police officers had posted their video selfie on a public domain then it would be a different matter all together, but the fact is, they sent it to a colleague.

They kept it within house...

I agree totally with what Lisa Dunn said in the Facebook comment section under the video of Olivia Pinkney, the assistant Chief Constable condemning her new recruits.

"I'm someone who has worked in difficult situations and to be utterly honest black humour is something that we all took part in. It's a coping mechanism. You are seeing the most awful things that the normal public couldn't even imagine. These officers were stupid for putting it on social media. But I think it could have been dealt with better! The families and public haven't really got a clue what was said and would have been none the wiser. Whoever reported them should have spoken to them. I've heard they are new to the job? Can you imagine what they saw! They struggled to find a way to process what they were seeing and coped in the wrong way....not in a very pc way and they are being punished for that. I don't think the public should have been told.”

The Sussex Police hierarchy should be protecting their rookie police officers, not hanging them out to dry.

Let's put this into perspective. Olivia Pinkney freely admits that, “Nothing in that video showed any detail of the scene.”

Two rookie police officers manning the cordon of the crash site, dealing with the horror behind them, both infallible to human nature.

Olivia Pinkney condemns their actions with the words “It is a huge disappointment and really upsetting,” while Katy Bourne adds her pennies worth with, “I am also aware of the hashtag that has been used and, quite frankly, personally I found it was grotesque.”

No Katy Bourne, what's GROTESQUE is the fact you've allowed a Chief Constable to retire early while under investigation for gross misconduct, while at the same time being paid £85,000 a year to hold him to account.

The hypocrisy of Sussex Police has been laid bare for the world to see. They are ready and willing to throw two rookie police officers to the lions, while protecting their seasoned Chief Constable's from the shame of facing the music over their own gross misconduct in office.

In my humble opinion and as an Ex-Royal Military Policeman, this incident should have been dealt with 'in house'. The police officer they sent the selfie to should have just have had a word with them. “We don't condone that at Sussex Police, make sure it doesn't happen again.” Any superior could have dealt with this behind closed doors. Whatever happened to private internal investigations?

Sussex Police are happy to conduct private internal investigations when it comes to allegations of gross misconduct against their Chief Constable's, but seem to prefer going public over something as minor as two rookie police officers taking an 'inappropriate' selfie.

Did you know that there were 26 complaints of misconduct against their ex Chief Constable Martin Richards and guess how many were found to be unsubstantiated? 26!

All investigated by Mark Streater, Katy Bourne's Chief Executive officer, paid £82,000 a year, ex Sussex Police officer with over 30 years service, and a good friend of Martin Richards.

Sussex Police are evidently indulging in the same old trick of “Look here, look here,” diverting our attention from what's going on “over there..”


To find out more about the corruption that runs deep within Sussex Police, I urge you all to check out my web page, www.shadowsussexpolicecrimecommissioner.blogspot.co.uk

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Shadow Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner: SUSSEX POLICE IN A PANIC OVER 'SELFIE.'

Shadow Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner: SUSSEX POLICE IN A PANIC OVER 'SELFIE.':


Panic rules supreme across the Sussex Police force today following the nationwide news coverage that two of their police officers took a selfie at the crash site of the recent air-crash at Shoreham's air-show.

Monday, 7 September 2015

ANN WIDDECOMBE SLAMS CONSPIRACY THEORISTS.


Tory grandee Ann Widdecombe has slammed conspiracy theorists in her weekly Daily Express column.

With the title- 'Take it from me, conspiracy theorists will never change their mind,' the overweight spinster ridicules those of us who believe that Dr David Kelly was murdered by secret forces, that Lady Diana was killed on the orders of the Royal Family and that Neil Armstrong ever walked on the moon.

Specifically targeting Grand-dad Chris Spivey, who having been convicted of harassing the family of Lee Rigby, Widdecombe writes:

Christopher Spivey is a conspiracy theorist who has made the lives of Lee Rigby’s family hell. He believes, without any foundation, that the murder was a plot to whip up anti-Islamic feeling. He even claimed that the soldier never existed and his harassment of the relatives landed him in court.

The exasperated judge rightly said that nothing would ever convince Spivey that he was wrong. Every MP knows the type: the constituent who in the teeth of evidence will insist there is a conspiracy. I had one who believed I was a Freemason conspiring with the police to persecute her!”

“WITHOUT FOUNDATION.”

Ignoring a wealth of inconsistencies in the official narrative, Chris Spivey isn't the only notable conspiracy theorist who believes not everything was what it seems.

Take Nick Kollerstrom and The Kent Freedom Movement for example; having published his ground breaking book on the London 7/7 Bombing 'Terror on the Tubes,' he too has visited Woolwich and has roundly disproved the official narrative of the day.


This latest snippet of footage asks the obvious question; WHERE'S THE BLOOD?

For Ann Widdecomb to imply there is no 'foundation' to the Woolwich incident, illustrates perfectly the 'Madness of Widdecombe.'


Mind you in fairness to journalistic impartiality, a comment posted by Lilly Bing states:

I was there. I can tell you now I saw that poor man and there was blood all over the place including the 2 who carved him up. He was covered in blood and that was not photoshopped at all. The sad thing is, there are many cover ups going on but if people like this organisation disbelieve and pick apart every event, when something real actually happens they just assume you're wearing tin foil hats and have nothing better to do. The government cover up some god awful events but you're making it worse. People think you've lost the plot and you're all loonies so if you ever find a REAL truth nobody will believe you. I'm not naive I know there are many fabricated stories out there 911 being orchestrated by Bush, Haute de la Grande cover up etc but this WAS a real event. R.I.P Lee Rigby.”

Someone is lying. If someone had his head nearly hacked off, there would be an awful lot of blood, but as the video shows, no blood at all.

Its interesting Lilly refers to the “many fabricated stories of 911” & “Haute de la Grande” but gives credence to the Woolwich incident by stating she was an eye witness who saw with her own two eyes “blood all over the place,” contradicting the video evidence shown above and the many pictures published in the newspapers.

Mind you since joining in August 22, 2012 Lilly Bing has had no activity across the board, which suggests whoever Lilly Bing is, she created a Google + profile just to leave that specific comment.

We are continuously warned about MI5 operatives engaged in Social Media manipulation and this comment seems to confirm he scaremongering often spread in Conspiracy Theorist circles.

Ann Widdecombe continues:

People deny the Holocaust. They deny Armstrong walked on the moon. They believe CIA agents were hiding in the bushes to murder Dr David Kelly or that the late Princess of Wales was killed on the orders of the Royal Family. They think UFOs have landed.”




Buy Me
Funnily enough Nick Kollerstrom has published a book about the Holocaust; Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.

A quote taken from the foreword by James H Fetzer.

Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that the history of the Nazi "Holocaust" has been written by the victors with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted, exaggerated and largely wrong.”

Buy Me
Then we have former Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker's book about Dr. David Kelly's alleged murder; The Strange Death of David Kelly published in 2007.

He writes with conviction, “I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this could not be suicide. The medical evidence does not support it and David Kelly's state of mind and personality suggests otherwise. It was not an accident so I am left with the conclusion that it is murder."

Once a collation MP in the Lib/Con government first as a Transport Minister, then the First Minister for Crime Prevention and responsible for Britain's equivalent to the FBI; The National Crime Agency; the Madness of Widdecombe knows know bounds as she tramples the reputation of a respected member of parliament.

She continues:

Such people all function perfectly normally in everyday life and before the birth of the internet most conspiracy theorists were harmless and caused no greater sensation than incredulous laughter in a pub. Now they can disseminate their views sufficiently widely to hurt survivors or families and even attract others to their causes.”

Wrong again you old witch,” Chris Spivey might say. Research out of University of Winchester, conducted by psychologist Michael Wood suggests the label “Conspiracy Theorist” no longer implies an idea worthy of immediate dismissal.

It is possible that the conspiracy-theory label has simply lost some of the power it once had,” Wood writes in the journal Political Psychology.

I'd go so far to suggest the label of Conspiracy Theorist has lost its negative connotations, for the simply reason the researches like Nick Kollerstom, Chris Spivey and Richard D Hall (amongst many many more) have put forward such convincing hypothesises of national and international events, that the Powers That Be, simply cannot explain their actions away.

THE PEOPLE REALLY ARE WAKING UP!

After-all a You Gov poll in 2013 revealed a whooping 38% of British people didn't believe Princess Diana died in an accident. 33% were bold enough to say outright they believed she was assassinated.

Even Queen Elizabeth II, upon hearing the news of her death, is alleged to have commented:

Someone must have greased the brakes.”

Now even the Queen is a Conspiracy Theorist.

DID MAN WALK ON THE MOON?

With extraordinary footage like the clip below reveals; the question of whether Neil Armstrong really stood on the moon is a question worth asking.


The Madness of Widdecombe really does know no bounds.


Ann Widdecombe ends her hit piece with:

It is right that Christopher Spivey should have been prosecuted if only in order to protect Lee Rigby’s family but he will go to his grave believing the rot he promulgates.”

I dare her to say that to his face. Taking into consideration the nightmare Chris Spivey has endured at the hands of Essex Police and the Social Services, I find it incredulous that a retired Tory grandee can condone an illegal prosecution, an affront to British justice and an abuse of a man's human rights, for doing nothing else but flagging up a false flag events which has enormous repercussions to the British people and Britain's way of life.

It makes me wonder whether there is still anybody around who believes Earth is flat.”

PUT THIS IS YOUR PIPE & SMOKE IT.


AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT; EAT THIS TOO!



FURTHER READING:

Wednesday, 2 September 2015

CHRIS SPIVEY: I'M NOT IMPRESSED.


While Grand-dad Chris Spivey is under the impression he's done much to bring the Alternative Media together, the truth couldn't be further away from the reality.

It is in fact fair to say that this disgraceful court decision has achieved a bit of unity in the Alternative Media and that is surely a good thing?”

A hero to his loyal fans, an internet troll to the ignorant man in the street, and a loving father and Grand-dad to his daughter Stacey and his grand-son Clayton; Chris Spivey doesn't impress me very much!


Having first come to my attention in July 2012 with his ground breaking article 'Monster Inc', I've been a staunch supporter of him ever since.


Reaching new levels of respect for his journalistic investigative skills with his judicially fatal article 'The Drummer Man,' Chris Spivey travelled further down the fabled 'Rabbit's Hole' than any other journalist has dared to go so far.

Taking nothing away from what he's already achieved; I'm disappointed in what he's failed to address, namely the Hampstead case.

ITS HARD WORK BEING A SPIVEY READER.

To be a Chris Spivey reader, you need at least three special qualities:

  • A tolerance of bad language and vulgarity.
  • Patience to read really really really long articles.
  • Imagination to suspend reality.

More often than not readers just had to take what he said at face value and trust that Chris Spivey had done the thorough research he claimed to have undertaken.

As he keeps telling us:

For obvious reasons there has been no major articles added of late as they take time and a lot of research to compile.”

I've personally lost all my friends over his Drummer Man article:


I expect many of his readers had to stretch their imagination of reality when Chris Spivey claimed:

  • Jade's Goodie's mum – Jackie Budden was Brenda Leyland, the McCann troll who was alleged to have committed suicide.

There is a comment on The Tap News Wire which reads:

Is Chris Spivey losing the plot?
A few days ago he posted an article suggesting the possibility that the ‘McCann troll’ Brenda Leyland, who was outed by Sky News and subsequently went on to commit suicide allegedly was or might have been played by Jackie Budden! JB is the mother of the late Jade Goody and looks nothing like Brenda Leyland.
When a number of his devoted followers attempted to put him right in a sensible and helpful way, he went bl**dy mad, as he always does when even mildly criticised.


Though in all fairness, he didn't claim this to be fact, but only an theory worthy of discussion!

  • Then the contention that the Prime Minister's wife Sam Cameron, doubled as Elizabeth Owen, a witness to the 7/7 London Bombing.
  • That Jimmy Jone's wife Jane Russell is actually Sonia Poulton, a journalist on David Icke's now defunct TPV television station.
  • That all the family photographs of Prince William and Princess Kate, with their son Prince George are photoshopped.
  • To his most famous claim to date that Lee Rigby didn't actually exist, and was actually fictional creational based on three individuals, Karl Whittle, Robert Sarjeant and Chris Amos.

Beware that these are just five examples of many many more extraordinary claims Chris Spivey makes on his website www.chrisspivey.org.

Chris Spivey could be right! But then again he could be barking up the wrong tree. It's hard work having to plough through the thousands of words and dozens of pictures he pus forward to validate his claims.

Only his most loyal supporters stick with him, without voicing any criticism. While Spivey appears to have lost support from the more mainstream reader, his most staunch supporters band closer together to ensure any criticism of him is roundly pounced upon, smeared and ridiculed.

I USED TO BE HIS MATE.

Once mentioned as 'Matt My Mate,' I've lost my position as being one of Spivey's most trusted allies.


This is what he once had to say about me:

The slightly eccentric, but a fucking nice fella all the same, Matt Taylor.”

Now I don't even get a mention.

Following Spivey's most recent blog, '“Spiv is a wrong-un look you, is it.”' in which he derides The Outlaw Jimmy Jones for being a troll and reiterates his claim that Jane Russell is actually Sonia Poulton; a reader called Lesley left a comment in jest which could just as well be levelled against me!

I understand how he feels. When Chris doesn’t pay me any attention I feel rejected and frustrated as well especially as I am his #1 fan. Its hell!”

To which Chris personally applauded her with the message:
Excellent comment Lesley. Chris xxx”

I'll happily admit to feeling rejected. When mentioning Alternative Media news sources in his blog, Chris Spivey omits to mention Guerrilla Democracy News, of which I am always boasting is a big hitter in the Alternative News media.

I feel frustrated that when I ask him a question, all I get is Lisa Peabody answering on his behalf.

I considered myself his number one fan and always beamed with pride if he ever mentioned my name in one of his articles.

Ego aside, I knew he had given me a mention because the readership numbers for Guerrilla Democracy News would always spike whenever he did.

“DO ONE! OTHERWISE I WILL.”

It all went wrong between Chris Spivey and I when the Hampstead case broke... And its this case which has compelled me to write this blog publicly voicing my disappointment in him.

Now you have to understand that up until this time, Chris Spivey would pounce upon any and every example of false flag government wrong doing and anything else that twanged his bullshit antennae for that matter.

  • Any Daily Mail news report that reported bullshit, Spivey would be on it.
  • Any news about the aftermath of the Woolwich incident, Spivey would be on it.
  • Any news about paedophiles getting away with it, Spivey would be on it.

This made it all the more frustrating that when the Hampstead case broke, nothing was forthcoming.

I'll readily admit that up until this time I had become reliant on Spivey's opinion. I know the likes of Ian R Crane would encourage us to do our own research rather than taking their word for it, but I had come to take Spivey's word for it because I simply never had the time to do my own research and relied on people like Spivey, Richard D Hall and James Corbett for doing the research for me.

When the Hampstead case broke my jaw dropped to the floor as much as everyone's else. Chris Spivey and Bill Maloney had been telling us for years that Satanic Worshippers ruled the world and this was the first time we were getting first hand testimony of what was happening from within the sick satanic cults.

I would have bet my month's wage that Spivey would cover it; but he didn't and my frustration grew and grew.

The new darling of the Alternative Media Danielle La Verite, in conjunction with her handler Thomas Sheridan were quick to publicly renounce and discredit the Hampstead kids testimony.

I simply couldn't understand why people wouldn't believe them and turned to Chris Spivey for guidance and advice.

As far as I was concerned, Danielle La Verite was abusing her new found fame to discredit and renounce the testimony of two kids, who in my humble opinion should be praised for telling their story.

In a moment of frustration I sent Chris Spivey the following message:

Get off the fucking fence Chris. You owe it to your fans.
One way or the other; do you support DLV or not?
As far as I'm concerned she is dragging the Truth Movement through the mud and I'm very disappointed and disillusioned.
Get off the fence Chris and tell it like it is.”

To which he readily replied:

Have a word with yourself Matt, you are losing the plot.

You are becoming a figure of fun, and from where I sit the only people dragging the truth movement through the mud are the likes of you & Catshit... Why the fuck should it matter to you what Danielle believes or doesn't?

She is entitled to her opinion and just because it differs from yours is no reason to spit your dummy out.

And lets face it Matt, you have made some awful errors of judgement of late... Like apologising to that drug addicted paid troll in the jungle for one... What the fuck has that self obsessed soppy cunt ever done to help further the movement that you are so concerned about being dragged through the mud?

My advice to you is worry about your own shop before trying to put other peoples in order... And that most definitely includes mine, because right now you are coming across as an egotistical, spoilt brat, with fuck all to brag about.

Who I support and who I don't has fuck all to do with you or anyone else... However, now you have brought the subject up, I don't remember seeing you at my court case last month... Course, shouting your mouth off at me is a sure fire way of losing mine.”

LIKE A KICK TO THE HEAD!

I had never been on the receiving end of Chris Spivey's wrath before and in all honesty it hurt.

While I thought he was way of the mark, I was willing to take his remarks on the chin and carry on.

After all:

  • Tom Cahill had up until that point attacked nearly everyone in the Alternative Media. While Spivey choose to react by calling him names, I choose to extend my hand of friendship. Keep your friends close but keep your enemies closer!
  • I believed it did matter what Danielle La Verite believed. She was targeting the Alternative Media audience and was using her fame to discredit testimony which I believed and still believe to be trustworthy.
  • Being called “an egotistical, spoilt brat, with fuck all to brag about,” was hurtful but I could handle it. Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.
  • Though what stung me the most was his comment, “I don't remember seeing you at my court case last month...”

Yeah, I don't remember him coming to my defence when I was arrested for saving an OAP's life too.


We know from his blogs that Spivey hasn't got time to read anyone else's blogs because he's too busy writing his own. Its a shame, because if he had read shadowsussexpolicecrimecommissioner he would have known that I was tied up fighting Sussex Police corruption and spending all my time, effort and money helping a very scared old man fight of dangerous thugs, who were in partnership with a corrupt Sussex Police force.


But either way; I let it go because I knew Spivey was under considerable pressure from Essex Police himself.

I've been in the same position. When I left the Army following the death of my mother, I returned home to discover my sister was a heroin addict and that my two nieces, aged 6 and 9 at the time, were living in a heroin den, in danger from the weirdos and drug users my sister was letting in.

I contacted the Social Services myself, only for them to goto my sister for clarification, where my sister manipulated the facts and turned them around calling me the mad one, whose information was unsound.

I fought hard, tooth and nail for the next 6 months to get my nieces away from danger and my sister the help she needed to kick her heroin habit.

I knew what he was going through... While Spivey had no idea what I was going through!

LISA JANE PEA aka LISA PEABODY.



Time went by and Spivey's blog became more prolific and his claims more bizarre and strange.

Take for example his article 'Double Crossed' which is a good place to start.

I challenge anyone to read through this without scratching their heads. It ends with his contention that “Brenda Leland – the so called McCann troll who topped herself – who in turn is the late Jade Goody’s mother, Jackiey Budden… Just sayin’.”


He started to back up his claims of various crisis actors being one and the same, by introducing a face comparison application, which matched the likeness of each face in percentage terms.

Father & Daughter

Any scientist who makes a claim usually publishes their methods to allow other scientists to re-create their experiments to determine whether their claims are sound or not.


Pryce is the Pope & I'm Barry from Eastenders

I became interested in what face comparison application Spivey used because someone made the bizarre claim that the actor Jonathan Pryce was actually Pope Francis and I wanted to test the comparison myself. So I asked him what face comparison application he used via Facebook messenger.


To which I receive a message from Lisa Peabody telling me I should “ask him personally.”

And here's me thinking sending him a Facebook message was asking him personally.

What I found most amusing was her comment, “I could easily find out and perhaps would, if it was someone else asking, however I am very loyal.”

I should have expected it really, after all, Lisa Peabody doesn't like to be questioned!


THE TRUE FACTS.

I reached the end of my tether when Spivey posted his last blog before his sentencing on 27th August 2015.

The first line read:

Ahead of Thursday’s sentencing, here are THE TRUE FACTS of what has really taken place since July 30th 2014, ALL OF WHICH CAN BE EVIDENCED. Please share this report far and wide because next time it could be you caught up in a nightmare from where there appears to be no escape.”

I was particularly interested in reading this because I wanted to know how my name was mentioned twice during his court date. Apparently I had been accredited with creating and posting the mock Sun Newspaper front page which had gotten Spivey in so much trouble.

Taken from the Court's transcript:

  • The Sun 'mock headline' was posted by a Matt Taylor as anybody can post on Spivey's Facebook account. Spivey had been threatened with violence regarding various posts and subjects on Facebook in the past.”
  • The Prosecution suggested that the 'mock' Sun posting on his Facebook page, even though posted by Matt Taylor had then been 'adopted' by him by not deleting it, and asked if Spivey agreed with its content. Spivey replied that he had, "No feelings one way or the other".

Surprised that Spivey promised to lay out “The True Facts,” I was disappointed he never addressed how I was apportioned blame for posting the mock Sun newspaper front-page.

After-all Lisa Peabody had already admitted it was her.


I was simply interested as to how it happened; especially considering everything I posted on Chris Spivey's Facebook page never stuck and was always refused with an error message.


I asked one more time in the comment's section of Spivey's 'Harassed' article:

Good recap of the facts, but from a personal point of view, it doesn’t answer how my name came to be mentioned in court?”

To which Pongo was kind enough to reply:

Matt – your name was mentioned because of the `screen grab` on Chris` Facebook page when you posted it, that was in the `legal bundle`.”

And that was fine... My question was answered and while I was still confused as to why they could 'screen grab,' something I had never posted, I was willing to let bygones be bygones and leave it be.

But little old Lisa Peabody just had to add her penny's worth...


And its for this reason and this reason alone that I am so disappointed in Chris Spivey.

If I had wanted Lisa Peabody's opinion I would have asked Lisa Jane Pea. The reason I ask Chris Spivey's opinion is because I want Chris Spivey's opinion, not someone I've never met and know nothing about.

And still Chris Spivey remains silent on the Hampstead case... I've come to realise that Spivey isn't all he's cracked up to be!

Leaving the last word to Lisa Peabody:

    Yes we know what issue you would like everyone to address Matt, unfortunately the reasons you want them addressed seem to be more about "you" than anything else... how you feel, blah blah blah..... You feel let down, after all you gave bill 20 kwid once.. I gave the peoples voice a fiver and iI'm not still banging on about it. You have a blog, write what you want on there, find the time to do your own research instead of making demands from everyone else. I see you feel so strongly about this that you have unfriended me and yet not Chris.... I think you are somewhat deluded and confused x”

Please show your appreciation with a donation.